Musk can save the world
Musk can provide entire world with free uncensored internet now or in future, if there would be willingness to make the world a better place. Tech potentially already ready, question is on ideals.
Musk can provide entire world with free uncensored internet now or in future, if there would be willingness to make the world a better place. Tech potentially already ready, question is on ideals.
Shows how record labels killed and absorbed the first generation of music-generation services, then argues for models that never train on copyrighted works – reference albums supplied at inference time, open training data, and judge models built from slop and human ratings instead.
Argues that runaway drones and machines will become as routine as petty crime, so cities need robot-response teams built like firefighters rather than police to combat a new nuisance.
Argues GDP and income are poor measures of prosperity and proposes median personally owned, liquidatable wealth as a better indicator of how ordinary people actually live.
The author proposes capping any company at 10 percent of server-grade GPUs, with progressive taxes on excess, to prevent AI monopolies, preserve competition, and force algorithmic progress rather than compute brute force.
Argues countries should align with open AI ecosystems rather than US proprietary stacks, framing the US demand to pick sides as hegemonic coercion and open source as protection against vendor lock-in.
Argues that Russian hybrid attacks pose less danger to Europeans than their own governments, which use the fear to justify permanent emergency powers and surveillance, as happened in the post-9/11 United States.
Argues ASML’s monopoly on EUV chipmaking machines and export controls choke global progress, and calls for essential semiconductor technology to be opened so all countries can build their own.
Argues that politicians are the most dangerous people in ordinary life because power corrupts and elections are too slow to constrain them, so systems should be designed around distrust, limits, liability, and constant oversight rather than trusting better leaders.
Argues immigrants only threaten democracies that lack strong constitutional rights protections, contrasting US assimilation with European preferential treatment, which it says teaches newcomers to demand privileges.